Search keyword: Nagorno Karabakh
Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) Igor Alexandrovich Plaviski, Head of Internal Affairs Office of the former NKAO Vladimir Vladimirovich Kovalyov, Chief of National Security Department on Nagorno Karabakh Sergey Semyonovich Ivanov, Commandant for Emergency Situations of the former NKAO Nikolay Vladimirovich
At that time, the policy of the Soviet leadership over the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh resulted in an anti-Soviet movement. On November 17, 1988, people gathered in the city's main square, Azadlig (Liberty, formerly Lenin), and protested against Moscow's policy. Millions of people opposed the policy.
"On the contrary, the Constitution of Armenia is based on the fundamental principles of Armenian statehood and pan-national aspirations enshrined in the Declaration of Independence of Armenia of 1990, among which aims for a 'reunification of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh,' and calls some territories of
For example, Bangladesh has consistently supported Azerbaijan's position on the issue of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In turn, Azerbaijan has supported Bangladesh in various international candidacies, such as for CEDAW, ITU, UNSC elections, and others.
It put an end to the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Happy Victory Day, Azerbaijan!
You are internally displaced from Karabakh, and during my time as a High Commissioner for Refugees, I visited Azerbaijan many times, and I was supporting the government in its policy to support the people internally displaced from Nagorno Karabakh and the regions around it.
Back in September 1988, during the Soviet era, when territorial claims against Azerbaijan emerged, the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling for the transfer of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region to Armenian SSR.
He recalled that it is Armenia that illegally (condemned by the UN) occupied, for thirty years, not only Nagorno-Karabakh but also double the territory inhabited only by Azerbaijanis, propped up by the Red Army: “It is not Azerbaijan that is responsible for the Armenians abandoning the region, as testified
Because Armenia's constitution and Independence Act states that 'Nagorno-Karabakh is the Armenian territory.' If the phrases 'Nagorno-Karabakh is Armenian territory' are not removed from the aforementioned act and constitution, a peace agreement cannot be signed."
Asgarov emphasized that this stance is primarily a sign of disrespect towards Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity: "I appeal to state officials and others that there is no such thing as ‘Nagorno-Karabakh’; there is Karabakh, which has historically been the territory of Azerbaijan and